Fuente: Press Releases - University  of California Santa Cruz
  Expuesto el: lunes, 25 de junio de 2012 18:01
  Autor: Press Releases
  Asunto: Lead poisoning blocks recovery of California condor population
| Study confirms lead-based    ammunition as primary source of lead in condors, shows population cannot    recover as long as lead contamination persists A comprehensive study led    by environmental toxicologists at the University of California, Santa Cruz,    shows that California condors are continually exposed to harmful levels of    lead, the principal source of that lead is ammunition, and lead poisoning    from ammunition is preventing the recovery of the condor population. The scientists reported    their findings in a paper to be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)    the week of June 25 (online Early Edition).    First author Myra Finkelstein, a research toxicologist at UC Santa Cruz, said    the study shows that without a solution to the problem of lead poisoning, the    condor population can only be sustained through intensive and costly    management efforts. "We will never have    a self-sustaining wild condor population if we don't solve this    problem," she said. "Currently, California condors are tagged and    monitored, trapped twice a year for blood tests, and when necessary treated    for lead poisoning in veterinary hospitals, and they still die from lead    poisoning on a regular basis." With a total population    of just 22 birds in 1982, the California condor once teetered on the brink of    extinction. A successful captive breeding program enabled the reintroduction    of condors into the wild (at sites in California, Arizona, and Baja    California), and the total population grew to nearly 400 birds (captive and    free-flying) by the end of 2010. But the new study, which focuses on condors    in California, describes a population still on the verge of collapse,    sustained only by ongoing human intervention. Since 1997, about half of    all free-flying condors in California have required treatment for lead    poisoning, and each year about one in five birds needs treatment. This    usually involves capturing the birds and transporting them to a zoo where    they can receive chelation therapy to remove lead from their blood and    supportive care until they are healthy enough to return to the wild. Condors are opportunistic    scavengers, feeding primarily on the carcasses of large mammals such as deer.    They can ingest fragments of lead bullets from feeding on carcasses or gut    piles of animals shot by hunters. Lead poisoning was probably one of several    factors that led to the near extinction of the species. The new study brings    together an interdisciplinary team and several lines of evidence to    understand the impact of lead on the condor population, said coauthor Donald    Smith, professor of environmental toxicology at UC Santa Cruz. A previous study from Smith's    lab had already identified ammunition as the principal source of lead    poisoning in condors. By expanding the number of cases studied by about five    times, the new study confirms and extends the earlier findings. The UCSC researchers are    able to identify the source of the lead in a condor blood sample using a    "fingerprinting" technique based on the isotope ratios found in    different sources of lead. Condors raised in captivity that have not yet been    released into the wild have low blood lead levels, with lead isotope ratios    that fall within the range of background environmental lead in California.    Most free-flying condors, however, have lead isotope ratios consistent with    those found in ammunition, and the higher a bird's blood lead level, the more    likely that its lead isotope ratio matches the lead in ammunition. In addition to blood    samples, the researchers also analyzed lead in feathers. Because feathers    grow over a period of several months, sampling sequentially along the length    of the feather gives a record of the bird's history of lead exposure. The    results not only show that condors are chronically lead poisoned, but also    suggest that the magnitude of lead exposure is likely much higher than    indicated by periodic blood monitoring, Finkelstein said. The study also found that    even when blood lead levels are below the threshold that would prompt treatment    for lead poisoning, condors experience sublethal health effects from lead    exposure. The researchers used a biochemical test that is a well-established    biomarker for lead toxicity in humans and wildlife. The results showed that    condors are as sensitive to lead as other species, and about 30 percent of    condors every year are exposed to levels that cause sublethal health effects. The research team's    analysis of condor population demographics, led by University of Colorado    biologist Dan Doak, was particularly discouraging. Without continued releases    of captive-reared birds and interventions to treat lead-poisoning, the condor    population would again decline toward extinction, the researchers found. How    long this would take depends on assumptions about the mortality rate from    lead-poisoning, but demographic projections indicated that, within the next    few decades, the wild condor population in California would be reduced once    again to just 22 birds. The free-flying condor    population does appear to be roughly stable under current levels of intensive    management, the study found. Coauthor Jesse Grantham, who recently retired as    head of the condor recovery program for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,    estimated the current cost of the condor program to be about $5 million per    year, including the contributions of all the agencies and organizations    involved in the effort. This level of management would have to continue in    perpetuity to keep the population from again declining toward extinction. Efforts in California to    address the problem of lead exposure have led to state regulations banning    the use of lead ammunition in condor habitat. A partial ban went into effect    in July 2008 and was later expanded. So far, however, researchers have found    no evidence that the ban has resulted in a reduction in blood lead levels in    condors. "Unfortunately, even    if only a few people are still using lead ammunition, there will be enough    contaminated carcasses to cause lead poisoning in a significant number of    condors," Finkelstein said. "We found that over the course of 10    years, if just one half of one percent of carcasses have lead in them, the    probability that each free-flying condor will be exposed is 85 to 98 percent,    and one exposure event could kill a condor." These findings suggest    that greater regulation of lead-based ammunition may be necessary to protect    condors, she said. Although alternatives to lead ammunition are available,    regulations limiting the use of lead-based ammunition face stiff opposition    from hunting organizations and gun-rights groups. In addition to    Finkelstein, Smith, Doak, and Grantham, the coauthors of the PNAS paper include    Daniel George, condor program manager at Pinnacles National Monument; Joe    Burnett of the Ventana Wildlife Society; Joseph Brandt of the U.S. Fish and    Wildlife Service; and Molly Church of the San Diego Zoo's Wildlife Disease    Laboratories. This research was supported by the National Park Service,    Western National Park Association, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 
 | 
 

